CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

CRTC Hearing April 24, 2013 - Part 1

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
CRTC Hearings

CRTC 9(1)(h) Hearing

The CRTC considers applications for mandatory distribution on cable and satellite distribution systems and applications for the licence renewal of independent conventional, pay and specialty television services. (April 24, 2013)

Presentations by:
Cable Public Affairs Channel Inc. (CPAC)
Accessible Media Inc.
Evan Kosiner, OBCI

Comments

Submitted by Brian Crump (not verified) on
Please, please allow consumers to purchase the cable/satelite content that we want. We are supporting content that we do not wish to purchase, nor do we want sent to our homes. We are free to purchase goods and services throughout the world without being forced to purchase additional goods and services we do not want just to support a product or service someone esle thinks we should have. I do not have to buy 5 songs just to get the one I want.............extrapalate this to all goods and services.............Please put an end to it.............Brian

I object to cable companies NOT providing options to select specific channel and drop others while demanding we have a whole lot of channels we never use and are nothing but filler. At this same time Channels like Shaw justify continuous unannounced increases in costs while supplying less and less. I want to see MORE Cable companies licensed immediately, AND present cable companies forced to provide consumer select only channels. The monthly charges for cable are absolutely uncalled fop0r considering the comparative costs to most every modern country.

Add new comment

Rockburn Presents
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Paul Nollen:
we have, here in Belgium, proportional representation and it changes nothing. In my view only direct democracy can. Paul
kate dyson:
PR would change things to the extent that there would rarely be a majority and so all representatives would have to carry on a public debate
Donna Chevrier:
Thank you for this excellent in depth commentary.
Jesse:
I wonder how this situation would change, if at all, if proportional representation were adopted.