CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Brian Cuthbertson, et al. v. Hassan Rasouli

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Brian Cuthbertson, et al. v. Hassan Rasouli (December 10, 2012)
Case # 34362

This case concerns issues surrounding the withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment.
The respondent, Mr. Rasouli, has been in a coma since October 2010.
The appellants, who are his physicians, seek to withdraw life-sustaining treatment and to administer palliative care.
The respondent’s substitute decision-maker refuses to consent to withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
The appellants acknowledge that they require consent to administer palliative care.
The appellants believe that they do not need consent to withdraw life-sustaining measures that are no longer medically indicated.
At issue is whether the appellants need consent or a determination from the Consent and Capacity Board that ending life support is in Rasouli’s best interests.

Add new comment

Rockburn Presents
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?