CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Cathie Gauthier v. Her Majesty the Queen

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Cathie Gauthier v. Her Majesty the Queen (December 13, 2012)
Case # 34444

On January 1, 2009 at 11:56 p.m., the appellant Cathie Gauthier dialled 9-1-1 from her home.
In a weak voice broken by sobs, she requested an ambulance.
When the operator asked her what the problem was she told the operator that her wrist was cut.
When asked if it was a suicide attempt, she said “it was a pact; my husband killed our three children."
The appellant also said that she had woken up lying in her bed with her three children.
Her wrist was slit and her husband was lying on the bedroom floor.
The appellant shook the children but they did not respond.
She stated that her spouse had cut her wrist and drugged everyone with sleeping pills.
In question is whether the Court of Appeal erred by upholding the appellant's guilty verdicts.
The grounds for the guilty verdicts were that the appellant should have prevented the children from consuming the drinks made by her husband.

Add new comment

Ask Martin Stringer promotional image
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?