CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Her Majesty the Queen v. Fredrick Owen Blacklaws

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Her Majesty the Queen v. Fredrick Owen Blacklaws (February 15, 2013)
Case # 34889

The respondent was convicted of charges related to unlawful confinement and sexual assault. The charges came following two separate incidents with different complainants. At trial, the respondent unsuccessfully applied to have the charges severed. The respondent appealed, arguing that the trial judge acted unjudicially in making the ruling and that his decision resulted in an injustice. The majority of the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal on the basis that the denial of severance resulted in an injustice.

Comments

Submitted by Fredrick Owen B... (not verified) on
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing? Although the court, clearly, heard the lawyer for the Defense, did it bother to listen? My opinion; yes, yes, no!

Add new comment

Order your copy of The Prime Ministers on DVD
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?