CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

IBM Canada Limited v. Richard Waterman

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

IBM Canada Limited v. Richard Waterman (December 14, 2012)
Case # 34472

The respondent was employed by IBM for over 40 years before being terminated without cause with two months notice.
When his employment terminated, he was 65 years of age and eligible to receive benefits under IBM’s employer funded pension plan.
At the time he had no intention of retiring and sued for wrongful dismissal.
After termination, he received a pension benefit of $2,124.25 per month.
The trial judge held that the appropriate notice period was 20 months.
The trial judge awarded damages based on lack of notice for 18 months.
The respondent was paid pension benefits after termination based on a fully vested pension.
The trial judge did not deduct the amount of pension benefits paid during the notice period from the damages award.
IBM Canada Limited appealed, arguing that an amount equal to the pension benefits should have been deducted from damages.
The Court of Appeal dismissed IBM's appeal.

Comments

Submitted by oto (not verified) on
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K per year. They fire him without cause and save the 'company' $80k per year. After the loss IBM appeals that the amount of damages for wrongful dismissal should be $80k minus the amount Dick Waterman received from his pension income. This pension income does NOT belong to IBM Canada, nor is it paid by IBM Canada ! If IBM Canada would have been successful in their appeal there would not have been a diminished disincentive for any company to fire an employee, who could receive retirement benefits from a Defined Benefit plan. Congrats to Dick Waterman for taking on Goliath. You did the right thing and justice prevailed.

Add new comment

Rockburn Presents
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?