CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Information and Privacy Commissioner, et al. v. United Food and Commercial Worke

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Information and Privacy Commissioner, et al. v. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401, et al. (June 11, 2013)
Case # 34890

The respondent union recorded video and took still photos of individuals located near and/or crossing a picket line during a lawful strike. Certain images collected by the union were subsequently placed on posters displayed at the picket line. The images also appeared in newsletters and leaflets available to union members and the public. Complaints were filed with the appellant Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta pursuant to the Personal Information Protection Act. An adjudicator held that the union was prohibited from collecting, using, and disclosing the video and photos without the individuals’ consent.

Add new comment

Outburst promotion banner
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?