CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Mandeep Singh Chehil v. Her Majesty the Queen

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Mandeep Singh Chehil v. Her Majesty the Queen (January 22, 2013)
Case # 34524
The appellant was arrested after a police sniffer dog found a large quantity of cocaine in his suitcase at the Halifax airport. At trial, the drugs were excluded as evidence and the appellant was acquitted. The judge held that the search violated the appellant's Charter rights.

Benjamin Cain MacKenzie v. Her Majesty the Queen (January 22, 2013)
Case # 34397

After being stopped for speeding, police officers became suspicious that the appellant possessed a controlled substance. The officers had their sniffer dog conduct a search of his vehicle and found a large quantity of marijuana. The judge held the search was unreasonable and excluded the evidence. The Court of Appeal overturned the decision and remitted the case to the Court of Queen’s bench for a trial on evidence.

Add new comment

Tête à Tête promotion image
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?