Supreme Court Hearings
Case # 34980
Matthew James Murphy v. Her Majesty the Queen (April 16, 2013)
Comments posted at cpac.ca are the opinion of the comment writer and not the opinion of CPAC. Comments that are potentially libelous or that are considered offensive or derogatory may be removed or withheld. Use of CPAC’s website and the submission and review of comments is subject to CPAC’s Terms of Service.
|
Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a |
|
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law.
IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K |
|
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing? |
|
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail? |


Add new comment