CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Rural Municipality of Britannia No. 502, et al. v. John Acton

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Rural Municipality of Britannia No. 502, et al. v. John Acton (June 10, 2013)
Case # 35229

The Supreme Court of Canada is holding an oral hearing on an application for leave to appeal. The respondent was injured in a single vehicle rollover accident that occurred on a road maintained by the applicant, Rural Municipality of Britannia. The applicant also engaged the services of the applicant Ron Handel Farm Ltd. to carry out certain work on the road. The respondent claimed the benefits he received through the Automobile Accident Insurance Act didn't cover his rehabilitation costs. As a result, the respondent a tort action against the applicants to recover damages. The chambers judge ruled that the respondent wasn’t entitled to maintain the tort action. The Court of Appeal allowed his appeal.

Add new comment

Question Period promotion image
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?