CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Thanh Long Vu v. Her Majesty the Queen

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Thanh Long Vu v. Her Majesty the Queen (March 27, 2013)
Case # 34641

At issue is the constitutionality of a search and seizure.
The police obtained a search warrant to enter a location in connection with a suspected theft of hydro.
Upon entry, the police discovered marijuana growing in the basement of the property.
After two laptop computers and a cellphone were examined, the accused was charged with marijuana-related offences.
The judge dismissed some of the evidence as it resulted from an unreasonable search and seizure, which violated his Charter rights.
As a result of the violation of his Charter rights, the trial judge acquitted the accused on all counts.
The accused was acquitted. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the acquittal, and ordered a new trial.

Add new comment

Rockburn Presents
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?