CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Tissa Amaratunga v. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, a body corporate

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Tissa Amaratunga v. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, a body corporate (March 28, 2013)
Case # 34501

The respondent is an international body comprised of 13 signatories representing approximately two dozen independent countries, including Canada.
Headquartered in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, its mandate is to manage and preserve fishing resources in the northwest Atlantic Ocean.
The appellant began working for NAFO at its headquarters in 1988 in a senior management position.
The appellant continued in this capacity until June 2005 when his employment was terminated.
The appellant commenced a wrongful dismissal suit in response in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia.
NAFO claimed immunity as an international organization.
NAFO asked the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia to declare itself without jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter.
The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia dismissed Northwest’s motion and determined that the matter could go to trial.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, stating that the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate this matter.

Add new comment

Beyond Politics
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?