CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Yannick Payette, et al. v. Guay inc.

   
       Loading CPAC video...    
         
   
   

| video language:    

   
   
Supreme Court Hearings

Yannick Payette, et al. v. Guay inc. (January 23, 2013)
Case # 34662

The assets of companies controlled by the appellant were purchased by the respondent in October 2004.
All of those companies worked in the same field, namely crane rental.
The contract of sale provided that Mr. Payette would remain employed by Guay.
The contract stipulated that Payette be bound by a non-competition clause and non-solicitation clause for five years after the end of his employment.
The company dismissed Mr. Payette in August 2009 and in March 2010 he began working for a competitor, Mammoet.
Guay applied for an injunction and pending the trial was granted a provisional injunction and a safeguard order.

Add new comment

Outburst promotion banner
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights


 

Latest Comments

Mak:
All this case and the police actions in this case prove is that the combined Canadian police forces are nothing more than and have no more a
oto:
The Supreme Court of Canada made the correct moral decision, regardless of case law. IBM Canada is paying Dick Waterman approximately $80K
Fredrick Owen Blacklaws:
Was the hearing simply a formality? Had the court made an, irrvocable, decision on the matter prior to the hearing?
Don Dash:
The main issue is that the threatening remarks were made in a place where it is assumed that confidentiality exist? Wasn't he in jail?