CPAC is proudly owned by these leading companies
  • Rogers Logo
  • Shaw
  • Videotron Logo
  • Cogeco Logo
  • Eastlink Logo
  • Access Logo

Timeline: F-35

Fri Dec 7 2012

As the F-35 procurement process continues to animate political discussion on Parliament Hill, follow the story and use the links for additional video and documents.

1997

Canada begins participation in the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program with a $10-million investment.

2002

Canada contributes another $150 million to the system development phase following the successful bid by Lockheed Martin.

June 2006

National Defence concludes a study of potential CF-18 replacements with a "strong preference for the F-35," according to the auditor general.

December 2006

Canada signs a Memorandum of Understanding for the next phase of JSF development, expected to cost US$551 million through 2051. Canada also had to accept F-35 procurement rules, according to the auditor general, who claimed ministers were not fully informed of this aspect.

May 12, 2008
 
The Canada First Defence Strategy calls for replacing the CF-18 fleet, beginning in 2017.
 
February 2010

The Pentagon notifies Canada that the U.S. is "reassessing its cost projections" because of expected delays in development, according to the auditor general.

June 1, 2010

In order to gain support for sole-sourcing the F-35, National Defence informs Public Works that it is the only available aircraft to meet Canada's future requirements.

July 16, 2010

The government announced plans to acquire 65 F-35 Lightning II aircraft from Lockheed Martin, calling it the only fifth-generation design that can meet Canada's needs and ensure interoperability with NATO allies. DND estimated a $9-billion acquisition cost.

Opposition parties question the plan to sole-source the new planes.

The auditor general would later conclude that "in the lead-up to this announcement, required documents were prepared and key steps were taken out of sequence. Key decisions were made without required approvals or supporting documentation."

August 2010
 
Public Works officials receive a more formal statement of operational requirements from National Defence, as is required to justify procuring the F-35 without a competition.
 
Sept. 15, 2010

Defence Minister Peter MacKay, Public Works Minister Rona Ambrose, and Industry Minister Tony Clement appear at the Commons defence committee

Nov. 17, 2010
 
The Standing Committee on Finance asks the parliamentary budget officer to analyze F-35 costs.
 
Nov. 18, 2010
 
House of Commons debate on a Liberal motion to immediately cancel the F-35 tendering process.
 
February 2011

Kevin Page's request to DND for a breakdown of the $9-billion acquisition cost cited by the government.

Here is the response

March 10, 2011
 
Report by Parliamentary Budget Officer on F-35 cost estimate

National Defence defended their estimates in a public response ($14.7 billion over 20 years). The auditor general would later report that the figures did not include operating, personnel, or training costs.
 
March 21, 2011

A parliamentary committee recommends the government be held in contempt of Parliament for failing to provide enough documents, including per-plane F-35 cost estimates. The government falls soon after, triggering an election. WATCH

2011 ELECTION

The Conservative platform remains committed to the F-35, with Stephen Harper saying increasing production costs in the United States will not affect Canada’s purchase price. Both the NDP and Liberals pledge to halt the process.

April 20, 2011

CPAC airs "F-35: The Politics of Procurement," a documentary produced with military journalist Scott Taylor. WATCH

Nov. 18, 2011
 
Peter MacKay and U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta reiterate their support for the F-35 program in Halifax.
 
March 13, 2012

Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino tells the Commons defence committee that the government has not ruled out backing away from the F-35 program.

April 3, 2012

Auditor General's spring report on F-35 procurement and cost - WATCH

The government announces seven measures in response, including an "F-35 Secretariat" within Public Works.

April 10, 2012

MacKay promises greater oversight and maintained that major differences between internal and external cost estimates were differences in accounting. WATCH

April 26, 2012

The Standing Committee on Public Accounts begins a study into the auditor general's report. Michael Ferguson is the first to appear. VIDEO

May 1, 2012
 
Senior bureaucrats and the head of the Royal Canadian Air Force defend their management of the project at the public accounts committee. WATCH
 
May 3, 2012

The witnesses return to the public accounts committee, along with Kevin Page. WATCH

May 7, 2012
 
House Speaker Andrew Scheer rules against a Liberal question of privilege that claims cabinet ministers intentionally misled Parliament concerning F-35 costs.
 
May 15, 2012

The auditor general returns to the public accounts committee and defends his April report from criticisms by government officials. 

September 7, 2012

The National Fighter Procurement Secretariat awards KPMG a contract to review F-35 cost estimates.

December 6, 2012

The government confirms they have received the KPMG report, promising to release publicly before the House of Commons rises next for the Christmas break. According to a statement from the public works minister's office:

We are committed to completing the seven point plan and moving forward with our comprehensive, transparent approach to replacing Canada's aging CF-18 aircraft.

December 7, 2012

Amidst published reports that the government will back away from the F-35 purchase, MacKay briefly tells reporters that: "we’re following the seven-point plan as we have been now for some months and into next week there’ll be an open and transparent discussion about the next steps that are going to follow in the CF-18 replacement."


-Compiled by Andrew Thomson

 

Rockburn Presents
The CPAC Digital Archive

Daily Programming Highlights

Twitter

Latest Comments

jjc:
LOL! I love seeing these guys roasted. They are almost always full of **** by the way CRTC.
Hagop Barounian:
Sorry but Bell is holding back A LOT of information about consumers preferred choice 3 year contracts compared to 1 and 2 years.
Chrys:
I agree with Hagop Barounian. Currently, postpaid plans and prepaid plans are COMPLETELY separate!