Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law when finding no fault with the use by two police officers of a video taken by the undercover officer and a still photograph made from the video in identifying him. (Case No. 39134) (January 21, 2021)

Whether the Court of Appeal for Ontario erred in applying the wrong standard of review and/or in misapplying the standard of review by substituting its own factual findings for that of the trial judge in re-calculating which party was (...)

Did the trial judge err by articulating the standard of care in terms of goals rather than steps? (Case No. 39049) (January 18, 2021)

Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral, et al. v. Teshome Aga, et al. Does the court have jurisdiction respecting membership issues in religious organizations that have their own constitutions and bylaws? (Case No. (...)

Should the bank’s customers be treated differently depending on whether their account balance is in debit or credit? (Case No. 38938) (December 7, 2020)

Did the court err by applying a different standard of scrutiny to the complainant’s evidence than was applied to the respondent’s? (Case No. 39109) (December 4, 2020)

Does the failure to deliver the main object of the contract render the limit of the liability clause inoperative? (Case No. 38904) (December 3, 2020)

Whether the Crown’s deemed trust claim for unremitted source deductions under Income Tax Act, Canada Pension Plan Act and Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996 has priority over court-ordered priming chares under the CCAA. (Case No. 38871) (...)

Whether MediaQMI was entitled to have access to and examine content of exhibits in issue. (Case No. 38755) (November 12, 2020)

Is the Youth Criminal Justice Act uncinstitutional if it denies the right to appeal? (Case No. 38546) (November 10, 2020)

Did the judge not have the jurisdiction to hear the release application of the appellant? (Case No. 38944) (November 9, 2020)

Whether the majority of the Court of Appeal erred in law in finding that the trial judge’s reasons were insufficient because he: failed to address the complainant’s reliability;found that the complainant’s evidence was (...)

Whether courts are providing an incentive to payors to be delinquent in their support payments by permitting a cancellation of outstanding arrears. (Case No. 38808) (November 4, 2020)

Should the jury have been told about the witnesses’ unsavoury character? (Case No 39006) (November 3, 2020)

Whether constitutional protection of Aboriginal rights contained in s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 extends to an Aboriginal group that does not reside in Canada – Whether phrase “aboriginal peoples of Canada” in s. 35 (...)

Case No. 39062 and 38861 Her Majesty the Queen v. Pardeep Singh Chouhan Her Majesty the Queen v. Chiheb Esseghaier Whether Court of Appeal erred in law in finding that elimination of peremptory challenges does not apply retrospectively — (...)

Did the Court of Appeal err in concluding that there was insufficient evidence of a serious risk to the physical safety of the Affected Individuals? – Is a sealing order necessary because reasonably alternative measures will not (...)

Are the provisions of the first paragraph of article 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR, c. C-25.01, setting at less than $85,000 the limit to the exclusive monetary jurisdiction of the Court of Québec valid having regard to section (...)

Attorney General of Saskatchewan v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of Ontario v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act was (...)

Case No. 38663 and No. 38781 and No. 39116 Attorney General of Saskatchewan v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of Ontario v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta The (...)

Were the video statements made by the three witnesses correctly judged not to be reliable and thus not admissible? (Case No. 38984) (June 12, 2020)

Did the police have a reasonable suspicion the appellant was engaged in criminal activity and induce him into committing a crime? (Case No. 38903) (June 11, 2020)

Does the fact that he accused has been deported render the case moot? (Case No. 37984) (June 10, 2020)

Is the appellant obligated to pay for fees outlined under an easement negotiated by the respondent prior to the establishment of the appellant? (Case No. 38741) (June 9, 2020)

Should the respondent be forced to comply with the sex offender registry despite being found not criminally responsible? (Case No. 38585) (February 20, 2020)

Was the trial compromised by the Crown’s failure to disclose an experrt report on battered wfe syndrome? (Case No. 38577) (February 18, 2020)

At issue is the role of modern litigation funding in providing access to justice for parties, including those who are insolvent or bankrupt. (Case No. 38594) (January 23, 2020)

At issue is whether legal person can benefit from protection of section 12 of the Charter. (Case No. 38613) (January 22, 2020)

At issue is whether the trial judge erred in the interpretation and characterization of the contract in question. (Case No. 38544) (January 21, 2020)

At issue is whether the Court of Appeal erred by emphasizing bankruptcy law over contract law. (Case No. 38571) (January 20, 2020)