Are the provisions of the first paragraph of article 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR, c. C-25.01, setting at less than $85,000 the limit to the exclusive monetary jurisdiction of the Court of Québec valid having regard to section (...)

Attorney General of Saskatchewan v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of Ontario v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act was (...)

Case No. 38663 and No. 38781 and No. 39116 Attorney General of Saskatchewan v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of Ontario v Attorney General of Canada Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta The (...)

Were the video statements made by the three witnesses correctly judged not to be reliable and thus not admissible? (Case No. 38984) (June 12, 2020)

Did the police have a reasonable suspicion the appellant was engaged in criminal activity and induce him into committing a crime? (Case No. 38903) (June 11, 2020)

Does the fact that he accused has been deported render the case moot? (Case No. 37984) (June 10, 2020)

Is the appellant obligated to pay for fees outlined under an easement negotiated by the respondent prior to the establishment of the appellant? (Case No. 38741) (June 9, 2020)

Should the respondent be forced to comply with the sex offender registry despite being found not criminally responsible? (Case No. 38585) (February 20, 2020)

Was the trial compromised by the Crown’s failure to disclose an experrt report on battered wfe syndrome? (Case No. 38577) (February 18, 2020)

At issue is the role of modern litigation funding in providing access to justice for parties, including those who are insolvent or bankrupt. (Case No. 38594) (January 23, 2020)

At issue is whether legal person can benefit from protection of section 12 of the Charter. (Case No. 38613) (January 22, 2020)

At issue is whether the trial judge erred in the interpretation and characterization of the contract in question. (Case No. 38544) (January 21, 2020)

At issue is whether the Court of Appeal erred by emphasizing bankruptcy law over contract law. (Case No. 38571) (January 20, 2020)

At issue is whether the trial judge committed an error of law as identified by the Court of Appeal. (Case No. 38739) (January 17, 2020)

The Supreme Court of Canada hears arguments on whether British Columbia has the authority to restrict oil shipments within its borders. In May 2019, the B.C. Court of Appeal unanimously ruled that the province’s proposed (...)

Did the court err when it substituted its own findings of fact for those of the trial judge? (Case No. 38681) (December 13, 2019)

Did the court err when it ruled that RCMP members who chose to job-share were not full-time employees? (Case No. 38505) (December 12, 2019)

Do courts in Quebec have the right to garnish funds held outside of the province by the garnishee who is located within Quebec? (Case No. 38562) (December 11, 2019)

How should the court interpret the right-of-way for electricity transmission and distribution? (Case No. 38254) (December 10, 2019)

Attorney General of British Columbia v. Provincial Court Judges’ Association of British Columbia (Case No. 38381) (December 9, 2019) Attorney General of Nova Scotia v. Nova Scotia Provincial Judges Association (Case No. 38459) (...)

C.M. Callow Inc. v. Tammy Zollinger, et al.. (Case No. 38463) (December 6, 2019) and Wastech Services v Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District (Case No. 38601) (December 6, 2019) How should the courts interpret the principle of (...)

Did the court errr when it authrorised a class-action suit against the appellant? (Case No. 37898) (December 5, 2019)

Should the mens rea assessment of a breach of parole, section 145(3) of the Criminal Code, be done objectively or subjectively? (Case No. 38540) (December 4, 2019)

Should a class-action lawsuit against video lottery terminals be allowed to proceed in a Newfoundland and Labrador court? (Case No. 38521) (December 3, 2019)

Assmar Ryiad Shlah v. Her Majesty the Queen (Case No. 38661) (November 15, 2019) Franz Emir Cabrera v. Her Majesty the Queen (Case No. 38677) (November 15, 2019) These two cases raise the question of whether the jury’s verdict of (...)

Can an individual who has suffered no personal harm or injury act as a representative plaintiff in a class action suit? (Case no. 38297) (November 13, 2019)

What standard of review should an appelate court apply on appeals from anti-SLAPP suits? What is the proper scope of the court’s inquiry into the merits of claims and defences in the process for the mandatory summary dismissal of (...)

Did the majority of the Court of Appeal err in law by concluding that the respondent’s section 8 Charter rights were violated by reason of insufficiency of grounds to support a Controlled Drug and Substances Act? Did the majority of (...)

Was the court correct when it ordered the cancellation of the mortgage agreement between the two parties? (Case no. 38242) (November 7, 2019)

Are Uber drivers employees and therefore entitled to the benefits and protections afforded by the Employment Standards Act? (Case No. 38534) (November 6, 2019)