(Case No. 38695) (October 6, 2020)
Did the Court of Appeal err in concluding that there was insufficient evidence of a serious risk to the physical safety of the Affected Individuals? – Is a sealing order necessary because reasonably alternative measures will not prevent the serious risks to privacy and physical safety? – Do the salutary effects of the sealing order outweigh the deleterious effects, in the context of this non-litigious probate matter? .